Established 1826 — Oldest College Newspaper West of the Alleghenies

Miami needs to hold open forums on hazing

The Miami University Code of Student Contact admits the term "hazing" is broad and defines it as encompassing multiple activities that prevent the positive development of a person. With the recent return of two Miami fraternities and the sanctioning of two Miami sororities and one fraternity, an open discussion on what constitutes as a bonding experience and what crosses the line into hazing needs to occur.

The all-encompassing nature of the definition of hazing creates confusion and uncertainty among Greek organizations, and it needs to be more clearly stated. All organizations on-campus need to meet in an open forum to discuss how to more narrowly define the term, which could lead to a batter understanding of the problem and a decrease in hazing incidents. The Panhellenic Association (Panhel) and Interfraternity Council (IFC) should go above the legal requirements of having new and active members sign an anti-hazing document. Despite signing these agreements, many members don't truly understand the definition of hazing and its implications.

The Greek community should have dialogues and presentations on the issue with concrete examples and an open discussion on instances where "fun and games" push the limits.

The openness to interpretation of the current definition of hazing allows Panhel and IFC to view situations differently and offer different punishments between alpha and non-alpha chapters. It decreases the continuity between infractions and punishments and the overall well-being of the Greek community.

The Miami Student editorial board recognizes the difficulty to elucidate the line between what is considered hazing and what is bonding, but there needs to be progress in creating a more concrete definition.

The university needs to create a comfortable environment where new members can talk with actives about what they feel is hazing and what is group bonding.

Active members don't know the point where one may feel personally uncomfortable and discussion without threat of embarrassment or punishment is the only way to clarify the line.

Panhel and IFC should go beyond searching students' Facebook.com profiles for alcohol violations and take an active role in creating programs to educate members on hazing. It is a chapter's responsibility to take care of their pledges and to make them feel welcome, but it is Panhel and IFC's job to make sure this is done in a safe and enjoyable manner.


Enjoy what you're reading?
Signup for our newsletter